A middle-aged white woman raised on the West Coast, living in the Midwest, struggling to deal with <gestures vaguely> all this.

  • When a book is banned or challenged, the reasons why can typically be reduced to a few simple categories: violence, sex, language, “dark” content, LGTBQ+ content, religious objections and racism. And today’s book checks EVERY SINGLE BOX.  Seriously, it’s that good.

    Maya Angelou’s “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” is the first of a series of autobiographical books with stories from the author’s childhood, from age 3 to the birth of her own child at 17.  She describes a series of exceptionally heavy moments, including being abandoned by her parents and sent to live with a grandmother in Stamps, Arkansas, , several horrific acts of racism towards her and her community by the “powitetrash” of Stamps, her father’s return and subsequent second abandonment with her mother at age 8, rape at the hands of her mother’s boyfriend, guilt over the boyfriend’s murder, presumedly an act of revenge by her uncles, causing her to withdraw and essentially become a mute recluse until she meets a wealthy black woman who introduces her to literature, where she finds solace from her trauma.  Later, her grandmother would send her to her mother in San Francisco to protect them from the growing racial danger in Stamps (there’s a harrowing moment in the book where her grandmother has to hide Angelou’s disabled Uncle Willie in a vegetable bin to protect him from KKK thugs, where he lay moaning and groaning under a layer of potatoes throughout the entire night).  While in high school, she visited her father in Southern California, where she experienced homelessness for a time after a fight with her father’s girlfriend. Towards the end of the book, during her final year in high school, she becomes concerned she might be a lesbian.  She eventually winds up initiating sex with a teenage boy, resulting in a pregnancy, which she hides until her 8th month in order to graduate high school. And that is where this first volume leaves off, and there is so much more in between the front and back covers that I couldn’t include here so, please go find a copy of the book for yourself. You will cry, smile, and want to throw things, sometimes all at once. So get it, read it, and mind your aim.

    Clearly, the book isn’t meant for very small children, but excerpts are routinely worked into high school curricula across the country.  Still, it remains one of the most frequently banned books in this country.  As recently as this year (2025!), it was stripped from shelves at the U.S. Naval Academy, along with 380 other titles, at the behest of Pete Hegseth, during his purge of anything remotely connected to diversity, equity and inclusion.  Thankfully it was returned after public outcry, but it’s unlikely to be the last time it’ll send Conservative Whites scrambling to clutch their pearls.

    The reason this book is so important, at least to me personally, is that it is ultimately a story of survival, of being tested and coming out the other side.  And it’s a story of an existence that is unfamiliar to many, and all too familiar for many others.  For those who haven’t experienced trauma at that level, it can be a much-needed lesson about privilege and empathy.  For those who see themselves in this woman’s story, it’s an affirmation, and validation that their own experiences are real, and are not shameful, but simply human.  And every other reader is going to connect to it in a different way.  That’s the beauty of Angelou’s memoirs.  They aren’t tales or fables, they are a Black woman’s lived experiences.  And she doesn’t ask us to judge, or find any particular lessons within the paragraphs.  She isn’t holding up cue cards and expecting us to “aww” at this moment, or “boo” at another.  The book, and her life story, simply IS.

    Now, how do you justify banning something that simply IS?

    A rational person will tell you, you can’t simply pretend the past didn’t happen, or that the present isn’t largely determined by what happened previously.  You can’t edit a life, removing all of the difficult bits until it is incapable of making anyone uncomfortable, and still call it truth.  A life simply IS, warts, farts and all.

    The people calling for bans of “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” are proudly irrational.  They preserve their inner peace by pretending others’ uncomfortableness doesn’t exist.  They seek to cover our children’s eyes and ears, and pretend that the world is good to everyone, and has always been so.  They seek to cover the eyes and ears of grown readers, as well, primarily college-age readers who are perhaps taking their first steps outside of the bubbles they were raised in, perhaps discovering the fact that they don’t have to carry on the same opinions and biases that their parents have, and perhaps realizing that the world is so much bigger and more colorful than they ever imagined.

    Pretending experiences don’t exist, or trying to cover them in an opaque, black plastic bag of shame, helps no one.  It doesn’t feed the knowledge-seekers looking for reasons why.  It doesn’t provide solace to the struggling soul who feels isolated and alone.  It can’t uplift.  It can’t bring awareness and understanding. It can’t broaden minds or create common ground.  It can’t make people rage at yesterday’s injustices or provide the fuel to create change for a more just tomorrow.  It moves no one, changes nothing, fixes nothing.

    If we want less racial tension, we need to have these human moments made accessible.  If we want to help people process trauma, we need to show them they aren’t alone, and that there’s a path forward.  If we want answers, we must be courageous enough to accept the bad with the good, the healing with the pain. And if we want truth, which we all should, these stories must remain within our reach, free of any stigma or taboo.

    Because, in the end, life simply IS. And that is beautiful.

  • Let’s start off this week with what is probably the first book that comes to mind when you think of banned books – Ray Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451”.  I chose this one because: 1) most readers have probably read it so I won’t need to spend a lot of time providing a synopsis, and 2) it’s a banned book about banning books, and yes, there are other important themes as well, but this is Banned Books Week and not Other Important Themes week, so just go with it.

    For those who haven’t read it in a while, or for those who haven’t read it at all, nor watched either of the movie adaptations, it is a story set in a future America where books are banned.  The government’s reasoning is that critical thought and independent ideas lead to disagreements, fighting and wars, so they’ve done away with all that by banning all books.  Conversations are reduced to inane prattle. Wall-sized interactive TVs televisions (called “parlor walls”) broadcasting highly-immersive but meaningless dreck designed to ensure a docile populace , too-fast cars, and other forms of instant gratification became the sole source of mental stimulation.  And firemen, no longer needed to put out fires due to improvements in technology, are now responsible for enforcing the book ban by tracking down contraband books and burning them, along with whatever house the books are found in.  Our protagonist, Guy Montag, is one such fireman. After Guy’s wife Mildred, who is obsessed with her parlor wall and strongly allergic to giving any thought to anything going on outside her own home, OD’s on sleeping pills, Guy starts to question his perception of happiness.  Days later, he’s called to burn the book-filled house of an old woman, who chooses to light a match and burn herself to death, along with her books.  Shocked by her death, Guy finds himself secretly taking a few books, leading to the somewhat predictable outcome that he will eventually read the books, discovering the knowledge within, and flee his previous life as a tool of an oppressive government to…well, you’ll have to read the book if you don’t know what happens to Guy.

    Anyhow, there is one main point that sometimes gets lost in discussions about the book, and it’s this: The government enacted the book ban, leading to the ultimately doomed dystopian society that Guy flees.  But it was actually THE PEOPLE who demanded the ban in the first place.  It was society that chose blissful ignorance over critical thinking, over intellectual discourse, over differing opinions that might hurt their delicate fee-fees.  No fascist autocrat subduing a population by force. No charismatic dictator tricking people into giving up independent thought and intellectual freedom like a mythical chef with a pot of slowly boiling frogs.  Simply a government giving its people exactly what they asked for. 

    The reason I bring this up at the start of Banned Books Week is because, well, here we are.  Book banning efforts have ramped up and are becoming more successful in our schools and public libraries.  The Trump administration is purging information from its websites regarding anything that paints Cis White America in an unflattering light (or simply doesn’t put those straight white folks in the nation’s adoring spotlight).  The Kennedy Center, Smithsonian Museums, and even all forms of public broadcasting have been either taken over by right-wing zealots or have been defunded entirely.  Tech giants are spending billions of dollars developing digital tools to (in their own words) replace artists, intellectuals and other highly skilled individuals with computer programs that’ll turn any drooling simpleton into a Mensa candidate.  And none of this really started with this administration, let’s be fair, but Jesus Christ on a Bicycle, has it taken off since.  And, yes, the administration IS INDEED full of fascist kleptocrats, but these people were given the keys to the government by millions of useful idiots who are cheering every single move.

    Bottom line is, beware of the firemen who are coming for our ideas.  But be more wary of the society who sends them, because that is the far bigger threat.

  • Welcome to my blog!

    You may be here because you stumbled across my rantings on social media and thought “that angry little gal may be on to something!”

    Or maybe you stumbled in by accident.

    Or somebody is trolling you by sending you a link.

    Or maybe you’re just angry, too, and looking for a fight.

    Regardless of how you found me, I offer a welcome, or an apology, whichever is appropriate to your individual situation.

    Here is a quick Q&A to help you get acclimated.

    Q. What is this blog about?

    A. I have no freaking idea.  I tend to be constantly angry about a lot of things.  My first planned posts are going to be a week-long series on banned books, to coincide with Banned Books Week (Oct 5-11, 2025).  After that, your guess is as good as mine.

    Q. Ok, but I need some idea if I’m going to invest any emotional effort into reading this.  Can you throw me a bone, please? What can I expect?

    A. Fine.  Whatever.  But don’t get cranky if I don’t follow the script.  Possible topics could be any or all of the following: First Amendment rights & religious freedom, reproductive rights, LGBTQ+ rights and allyship, common sense gun legislation, criminal justice reform, the importance of being a good neighbor (domestically and internationally), mental health, how it feels to be a feral bog witch with a job and extra-curriculars that require an excessive amount of peopleing, history and genealogy, and even how impossibly incredible dogs (or any other random animal) are.

    Q. I have young persons / overly-sensitive persons who might like to read your blog.  Do you ever swear?

    A. Fuck no. Next.

    Q. Is your content generally considered offensive or controversial?

    A. Depends.  My general philosophy is “try not to be an asshole”.  Do I make people angry on occasion?  Sure.  Do I target people who I feel are toxic or evil on occasion?  Absolutely.  Do I “punch down”, saying unkind or “edgy” things about people who are already struggling through little or no fault of their own?  Never, or at least I try very hard not to.  And if I do, I hope I get called out on it.  I am a progressive, leftist, atheist, middle-aged white woman, raised in Southern California, transplanted to rural Wisconsin.  Make of that what you will.

    Q. I left a mean-spirited, ill-informed, toxic comment on one of your posts to rile you and your readers, and now it’s gone.  Don’t you believe in the Marketplace of Ideas?  BTW, I’m a toxic troll living in my mother’s basement, but I pay for my own Netflix, so it’s fine and totally mature. Send n00ds.

    A. The Marketplace of Ideas is only for ideas that are valuable.  If you feel I’ve missed some nuance, or you think I’m wrong about some point and you’re willing to engage respectfully, please leave a comment. I will be the first one to admit I don’t always get it right, and I’m happy to learn and grow.  Otherwise, if you’re just going to be nasty, stupid or tediously anti-social, take your BS back to Elon’s site, where it belongs.  Byeee.

    …You still here?

    Fabulous. I’m glad. Let’s get to it, while we still can.